Read Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Frans Eemeren

4.9/5 (34319 ratings)

Description:In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness , Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticated experimental research.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. To get started finding Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Pages: —

Format: PDF, EPUB & Kindle Edition

Publisher: —

Release: —

ISBN: 9048126142

Description: In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness , Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticated experimental research.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. To get started finding Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Special Offer | $0.00

Special Offer! | $0.00

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

More Books

Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse (Studies in Rhetoric and Communication)

Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse (Studies in Rhetoric and Communication)

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments by van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob, Johnson, Ralph H., Plantin, Christian, Willard, Charles A.(March 3, 1996) Paperback

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments by van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob, Johnson, Ralph H., Plantin, Christian, Willard, Charles A.(March 3, 1996) Paperback

Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse (Studies Rhetoric & Communicati) by Frans Van Eemeren (2002-06-12)

Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse (Studies Rhetoric & Communicati) by Frans Van Eemeren (2002-06-12)

Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (Licenciatura) (Spanish Edition)

Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (Licenciatura) (Spanish Edition)

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (Argumentation Library) by Frans H. van Eemeren (2015-08-29)

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (Argumentation Library) by Frans H. van Eemeren (2015-08-29)

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules (Argumentation Library) by Frans H. van Eemeren (2009-07-28)

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules (Argumentation Library) by Frans H. van Eemeren (2009-07-28)

Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation

Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation

Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday

Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory